http://andycowl.disqus.com/I am right. You are wrong. Disqus.enThu, 18 Jan 2007 18:34:22 -0000http://www.nbrightside.com/blog/2005/12/21/detailed-analysis-of-referer-logs/#comment-1327887<p>An analysis of search terms is already pretty fun. What about the more obscure ones?</p><p>I'm subscribing as of now...</p>Andy PiperThu, 18 Jan 2007 18:34:22 -0000http://www.nbrightside.com/blog/2005/12/21/detailed-analysis-of-referer-logs/#comment-1327885<p>Andy,</p><p>"Old gems may totally get ignored depending on timing.</p><p>I might have one avid reader."</p><p>I laughed out loud at both of those sentences (and associated links). Which is a bit worrying really - you wouldn't want to see the photos.</p><p>I may be a stalker, but it could be worse ;-)</p><p>P.S. Actually, because I'm your avid reader and 'get' what you're talking about, I try not to comment! I'm more interested in what someone on the other side of the world thinks about your blog!</p>Doug BurnsTue, 20 Dec 2005 19:44:53 -0000