http://andycowl.disqus.com/I am right. You are wrong. Disqus.enTue, 27 Feb 2007 18:32:32 -0000http://www.nbrightside.com/blog/2007/02/27/uk-broadsheets-narrow-view-of-syndication/#comment-55329314<p>It took that long? I never watch the SPL anyway, my team's in Division 1 and my wife's is in Division 2 :)</p>GrahamTue, 27 Feb 2007 18:32:32 -0000http://www.nbrightside.com/blog/2007/02/27/uk-broadsheets-narrow-view-of-syndication/#comment-55329318<p>Yeah but who wants to read about a football league that is over in mid-November :-)</p>Andy CTue, 27 Feb 2007 16:00:52 -0000http://www.nbrightside.com/blog/2007/02/27/uk-broadsheets-narrow-view-of-syndication/#comment-55329317<p>Ok I know it's of no interest to 99% of you all, but the feeds from <a href="http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/">The Scotsman</a> seem to a. work the way they should and b. give the information that they should (At the very least they are better than The Scotsman's feed to Yahoo! which is often several MONTHS out of date)!</p>GrahamTue, 27 Feb 2007 15:56:28 -0000http://www.nbrightside.com/blog/2007/02/27/uk-broadsheets-narrow-view-of-syndication/#comment-55329322<p>It's worse than just the names of the Times feeds being questionable. I find that the content is mixed up, too. For instance, i frequently see political or sports-related stories in the Entertainment feed. They responded to my feedback to say that they are addressing the problems "as a matter of urgency", but I don't see any evidence of that.</p><p>Nice round-up.</p>Andy PiperTue, 27 Feb 2007 12:21:54 -0000